In principle, every author (self published or otherwise) should be in favor of diversity and competition in the book distribution marketplace. The reason? Because competition in any area of commerce fosters continuing innovation, more choices, and more price competition. Unfortunately, sometimes a competitive marketplace turns into a monopolized one. When that happens, idealism may have to take a back seat to pragmatism, and an author may have to just make the best of what she’s got.
Obviously, I’m speaking about Amazon’s extraordinary success in locking down the self-publishing market, and the Seattle giant of on-line retailing is hardly to be criticized for being so successful. Without Amazon’s innovation and efforts, the eBook market – and with it opportunities for self-published authors – would certainly have evolved far more slowly.
The benefits to authors in the short-term have been very substantial indeed: a huge and still growing market for self-published books in eBook, print and audio form; the setting of a generous, 70% royalty benchmark for authors; and easy tools permitting even modestly tech savvy authors to turn their manuscripts into salable products.
The deficits are less often spoken about or appreciated, in part because they are only just now starting to matter. Principally, they amount to this: what you’ve got now is likely to be as good as you’ll get for a long time. But things could get worse.
Why? because now that it’s captured the market, Amazon’s incentive to continue innovating has radically decreased. Its need to offer generous royalties to authors is waning, too, because that’s where most readers shop for eBooks.The obvious historical example of this phenomenon is the death of innovation in desktop productivity software after Microsoft Office came to dominate the industry. As I’ve written about before, this had profound impacts on authors as well.
None of this would impose any difficult choices for self-published authors were it not for the existence of the Kindle Direct Publishing Select program (KDP Select). In order to enroll an eBook in this program, and author must give Amazon the exclusive right to distribute that book (the author can renew or opt out after 90 days). And while the benefits of the program are actually pretty slim, they appear to be significant enough to most authors to opt in, and therefore opt out of every other electronic distribution channel, thus depriving Amazon competitors of as broad a range of products.
The result is that self-published authors are helping to make it more difficult for existing competitors to survive, or for any new company to enter the eBook marketplace. Sony, the first major seller of eBook readers and eBooks, gave up years ago. More recently, Barnes and Noble announced that it is discontinuing selling eBooks at all in the United Kingdom. Kobo marches on, but outside of Canada its share of the marketplace is extremely small.
The erosion of market share for these two companies can only get worse, since just about everyone that owns a Kobo or a Nook also owns an iPhone and/or an Android device, and Amazon has shrewdly made Kindle software available for free on these devices. Sales of dedicated eReaders have fallen dramatically as a result (although Amazon’s line of Kindle readers continues to capture the majority of these declining sales). The result is that while you can only read Nook books on Nooks and Kobo books on Kobos, you can read a book you buy at Amazon on just about every other consumer device on earth that has a screen.
The situation is made worse by the fact that neither of the two remaining distributors that has the market capacity to provide real competition to Amazon – Google (through its GooglePlay store, and Apple through its iTunes/iBook app) – is trying to do so. GooglePlay’s greatest impact on self-publishing is its status as the preferred distribution channel for eBook pirates, while Apple has made little effort to make it easy for author’s to do business with it, or to make many sales when they do.
That puts authors in the position of having to decide whether they want to maximize sales of their books in the short-term, by joining the Kindle Direct Publishing Select program, or to do their part to preserve some degree of competition in the marketplace. Of course, given the minuscule impact of the vast majority of self-published authors, a decision to “go wide,” and sell books through all of the remaining meaningful competitors will have no material affect on Amazon sales or policies at all.
Amazon obviously realizes that, as the incentive it gives to enroll in KDP Select aren’t very great. The program only offers the following benefits:
- The right to offer a book for free for up to five days in each 90 day exclusivity period, as well as royalty-bearing “count down” deals;
- Inclusion of the book in the Kindle Unlimited and Kindle Owners Lending programs, where monthly fee paying KU members can download books without paying a per-book fee;
- A share of the KDP Select Global Fund every time such a member reads a page of your book;
- A 70% rather than a 30% royalty in Japan, India, Brazil and Mexico;
While free sale days initially worked well, most authors now seem to be finding that free sale days don’t result in increased ongoing sales (that was certainly my experience, despite over 4,000 free downloads). Since most authors have few, if any, sales in Japan, India, Brazil or Mexico, that feature is of little value.
That leaves the KU and Kindle Owners Library aspects of the program. In genre fiction, this is likely to result in income the author might not have otherwise received, since KU members may not read many books outside the program once they’ve paid to be part of it. The income per book to the author is lower than in the case of a sale, however, and only a very small percentage of all eBook readers are members of the KU program in any event.
Results have varied widely for individual authors. Some do better in the KDP Select program than outside, and others the opposite. And sometimes this changes over time, and particularly when Amazon changes the program, as it periodically does (e.g., paying out on a per-page read rather than a download basis, because of people gaming the system).
The major benefit to the KDP Select program to my mind, is the ability to get exposed to more readers. The biggest problem for authors is discovery of their books by new readers. The ways to get noticed are extremely limited, so anything that can meaningfully increase a book’s visibility is extremely valuable.
Why does Amazon offer so little of real value in exchange for the sole right to sell a book in eBook form? Normally, vendors pay a meaningful premium for for exclusivity. Obviously, because it doesn’t have to. For starters, it’s got most of the business already (reports that Amazon’s share of eBooks has declined fail to include the rapidly increasing books of self-published authors). I can’t imagine that any author (in the U.S. at least) offers her book only on Nook or Kobo, and not Amazon. Second, it takes extra time, effort (and if you use a service provider) cost to create and upload separate files for separate distributors. And every time you update your back matter or make another change, you have to do it again. Given how few sales most authors are going to make outside of Amazon anyway, why go to the extra cost and effort of going wide at all?
Why indeed? Last year, I put my second book in the KDP Select program to see what impact the free sales feature might have. The answer was not much. This January, I went wide with both of my books, and out of 382 eBooks I sold through March 31, all but 24 were through Amazon. Since most of those sales resulted from paid promotions I ran, I likely lost more “sales” than I would have made had I been in the KDP Select program, since any KU members that were on the promotional email lists would have been more likely to download my books (since they could do so for free), even though the books were already discounted to $0.99.
Sad to say, although I’d never run a free sale again, I expect that at this point my books are better off in the KDP Select program than outside of it. So I’m about to try one more trail, by putting one of my books in the KDP Select program, and compare sales between the two books. As usual, when the data is in, I’ll report back on it here.
Hi Andy. I’d first like to say I appreciate the effort you’ve put into this article. Normally when I see what is becoming a lengthy post I abort, but with your articles I know the groundwork has been done. I’ve yet to read a post from you where there isn’t a valid point or two which affects the majority of indie authors.
Having said all of the above, there is one tiny issue I would query. KDP as I understand it is the entire self-publishing programme on Amazon for Kindle. Where you refer to exclusive ‘enrolment’ on KDP, I think it might be more appropriate to say ‘KDP Select’, which is where the KOLL / KU sub-programmes enter into the deal.
For example, I had all of my titles listed on KDP – but not all of them were on ‘KDP Select’.
Why? Those titles I didn’t ‘enrol’ on the KDP Select programme were eligilble for me to submit to Kobo and, Smashwords. You contravene Amazon’s exculsivity passage if you enrol a title on KDP Select and elsewhere.
I have long since experimented and now all except one of my titles are exclusive to Amazon’s KDP Select.
I’ve listed ‘Ten Days in Panama’ with Smashwords for FREE, so it will be widely distributed by them – and I have now twice reported my own title for being available free elsewhere.
What am I up to? I’m aiming to have at least one title ‘perma-free’, which can only be done with Amazon if you can prove with supplied links the appropriate titles can be price-matched. The whole plan is still underway. I’ll let you know if it works.
Once again, great post – and now I must apologise for such a lengthy response. 🙂
Tom, thanks for the kind words, and you are, of course, right on two scores: while I may be ambivalent about going “wide,” I do seem to reliably go “long.” And indeed I should have added “Select” to KDP. I’ve made the edits, and thanks for reminding me on that.
There seems to be consensus among the comments I’ve seen around the Web that the permafree route is a keeper. I’ve only got two books completed so far, so I’ve been reluctant to go that route yet, but I do plan to try it out when I’ve got more inventory to work with. I may follow the route that some have done, and write something more in the nature of a long story or novella and use that as my permafree offering, but that, too, remains to be seen.
Good luck with bringing Amazon around sooner rather than later to (non) price-matching Ten Days in Panama. I’ll look forward to hearing whether you decide that this is working as intended.
As ever, an intelligent, well researched and argued post.
I have two ebooks with Amazon, exclusively. My reason? It’s straightforward and I can get on with writing more books. I barely promote my current books. Do they sell? Sporadically. Do I mind? No. And yes … I’d love to have thousands of readers, but I don’t and the only way I can think of getting them is to keep writing the best work I can. If I write it, they will read … am I naive? Absolutely.
As for the success of Amazon, we laud and fear such a phenomenon. And you’re right, as long as competition fades, the future is uncertain. But isn’t that what the future is always about?
A great, thought provoking post. Thanks.
Thanks, Julia. It does first and foremost come down to writing great books, doesn’t it? Whether or not you’re personally selling many, you’re certainly succeeding in the great books department. Hopefully the sales will come around as the just reward, one way or another.
Thanks, Andy. I’ve decided to spend my emotional energy on writing. I know that marketing is vital to commercial success, but I know what gives me the most satisfaction. Perhaps, if or when I have more books to sell, I will market more. But life is short and I’d rather get the stories I want to tell written – marketing means less writing time.
I’ve found that it not only takes time away from writing, but that somehow it has a tendency to crowd out writing entirely.
The reason(s) for me seem to include needing a critical mass of time for writing to sustain it at all, and perhaps that it’s easy to be in one mind set or the other, but difficult to be in both during the same period of time.
I seem to have various demands on my time at the moment, and my writing gets squeezed out. The only thing keeping me going is the fact that these other ‘demands’ are time limited. In the meantime, nothing is lost, writing-wise, as my brain is filtering and planning and honing ideas. Thinking time, for me anyway, is as vital to the writing process as putting words down on a page.
Great article. We are all asking the same questions – constantly.
Thanks, Lucinda. I just with that one of these days, one of us will figure out all the answers. If they do, I sure hope they let the rest of us know.
Yet another informative and fascinating post, Andrew. Many thanks!
Your very welcome, Marcus. I hope that all is well with you.